As Publius, the pen name used by several of the founding fathers in writing what was eventually called the Federalist Papers in the 1780s in the time before the 13 Colonies of the United States decided to commit to the current manifestation of the constitution, my presence is once again being resurrected to debate the constitutional challenges we face today in the 21st century. To remind you, the original Federalist Papers are a group of Opinion pieces used by several of the founding fathers in the 1780s to argue the merits of a more centralized government entity they eventually called the Federal power. My presence has once again been resurrected such that those that read these arguments will focus on the content of the argument instead of the individual whom wrote the articles and the potential distraction of conversation around the individual’s possible intentions for writing these articles.
This is the first article in a series of many articles in which we argue the need to start a new Federalist movement that we would like to call Federalist 2.0. This movement’s focus would be to educate and certify individuals to prepare them for leadership positions in the public sector and then for this movement to monitor the decisions of those that are elected to ensure they hold true to their commitment to the Federalist principles. The ultimate purpose of the Federalist 2.0 articles and movement is to define its principles, to determine what it means to be a Federalist and to call out the need to have a Constitutional Convention (Suggested timeline would be no later than 2026 which is 250 years after the declaration of independence.) to re-evaluate and advocate potential constitutional changes to the United States Constitution. We believe that these Federalist 2.0 principles are appropriate path to preserve the natural God given rights for “Freedom” provided to mankind as outlined in the original works of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution as defined by the Founding Fathers.
There will be 50 articles within nine different chapters that will outline the necessary steps for those inside government and outside government to determine how to re-evaluate their current method of operating “Government” from local municipalities to the national government. These articles will present the argument that the founding fathers did not anticipate several methods of cooperation among minority groups whom improperly impose their will as a group onto other groups in violation of the intent of the constitutional purpose. These new oppressive methods have been born from worldwide challenges regarding how to distribute natural resources, the use of communications tools and techniques that are more indoctrinating than educating, and technologies that are making humankind more prosperous than any other time in mankind’s existence where this productivity is not leveraging mechanisms for freedoms, as intended by the Founding Fathers, but are enabling the onslaught of social/progressive activism with the intent to redistribute wealth while steering power to a consolidated few.
Originally, we developed the Federalist papers to articulate the need for the 13 states to more fully integrate their control over several issues such as international commerce, coordinated defense and the ability to manage economic commerce across state lines. With the basis of our argument, in the late 1700’s, being that this more tightly organized union would be better prepared to meet these challenges. In the first Federalist Papers, the argument was that if the states were to not form a more cohesive union, the passions of men would drive the states to eventually engage in non-productive conflicts or civil war that would ultimately lead to the destruction of the United States of America or significantly lessen its power in the world at large. We will again make this argument with the Federalist 2.0 papers as too much Federalist power cannot sustain the concept of “Freedom” and the passions of men will be unleashed on minority groups and individuals in an equally destructive manner.
This is the first article in a series of many articles in which we argue the need to start a new Federalist movement that we would like to call Federalist 2.0. This movement’s focus would be to educate and certify individuals to prepare them for leadership positions in the public sector and then for this movement to monitor the decisions of those that are elected to ensure they hold true to their commitment to the Federalist principles. The ultimate purpose of the Federalist 2.0 articles and movement is to define its principles, to determine what it means to be a Federalist and to call out the need to have a Constitutional Convention (Suggested timeline would be no later than 2026 which is 250 years after the declaration of independence.) to re-evaluate and advocate potential constitutional changes to the United States Constitution. We believe that these Federalist 2.0 principles are appropriate path to preserve the natural God given rights for “Freedom” provided to mankind as outlined in the original works of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution as defined by the Founding Fathers.
There will be 50 articles within nine different chapters that will outline the necessary steps for those inside government and outside government to determine how to re-evaluate their current method of operating “Government” from local municipalities to the national government. These articles will present the argument that the founding fathers did not anticipate several methods of cooperation among minority groups whom improperly impose their will as a group onto other groups in violation of the intent of the constitutional purpose. These new oppressive methods have been born from worldwide challenges regarding how to distribute natural resources, the use of communications tools and techniques that are more indoctrinating than educating, and technologies that are making humankind more prosperous than any other time in mankind’s existence where this productivity is not leveraging mechanisms for freedoms, as intended by the Founding Fathers, but are enabling the onslaught of social/progressive activism with the intent to redistribute wealth while steering power to a consolidated few.
Originally, we developed the Federalist papers to articulate the need for the 13 states to more fully integrate their control over several issues such as international commerce, coordinated defense and the ability to manage economic commerce across state lines. With the basis of our argument, in the late 1700’s, being that this more tightly organized union would be better prepared to meet these challenges. In the first Federalist Papers, the argument was that if the states were to not form a more cohesive union, the passions of men would drive the states to eventually engage in non-productive conflicts or civil war that would ultimately lead to the destruction of the United States of America or significantly lessen its power in the world at large. We will again make this argument with the Federalist 2.0 papers as too much Federalist power cannot sustain the concept of “Freedom” and the passions of men will be unleashed on minority groups and individuals in an equally destructive manner.
0 comments:
Post a Comment