In chapter 7 of these articles, we will answer the question, “What are the necessary functions of government?” Our answer to this question is rooted in several of the original works of the Federalist Papers and these original works still hold true today as guiding posts for effective governance. Specifically, the need for a solid monetary system is critical for a nation’s long term existence. For the United States, the monetary system is the pinnacle of our existence as an economic power. Such that within the United States this monetary tool is called the Dollar and the strength or weakness of this instrument will determine if the population overall will grow in wealth or will retreat into a weakened state of pure efforts to exist or sustain. With current efforts of the government to prop up the private sector with Treasury funds and supplement the citizens with progressive governmental support, the nation is drawn deeper into debt and the potential now exists that the population at large may need to levitate at the level of sustenance. Leaving the nation the only option but to engage in inflationary efforts to reduce the overall debt in hopes that the productive power of the citizenship will outgrow the inflation and pay off the debt in due time. The perception of government debt is one that we spent much time debating and assumed future generations would understand that, by definition, the assumption of debt is again an oppressive move on future generations and the government should refrain from this endeavor. We will also highlight that the concept of “In God we Trust”, printed on the US dollar, is not a commitment to “God” in of Himself, but to the concept that free markets are a form of trust. Given mankind’s natural freedoms, we will work together to provide for each other without the need of a third entity or “The Government” intervening and attempting to impose a “fair-mindedness” will on the markets.
We also will touch upon the need for the Media to perform their duties with an eye on the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence as their moral compass. Current media efforts are shown to align themselves with the factional concept of the “higher good” that inevitably reveals itself as attempts to increase government or increase big business. There is a need for the Media as a whole to abandon the desire to take sides and to do their duty as defined by the Constitution, and that is to protect the general public from oppressive laws as defined by the government and to protect the general public from businesses that might miss-use well intended laws.
The Founding Fathers defined the basics of the Constitution to ultimately protect the private property of any individual that owns private property from external appropriation of that property from another country and from the internal confiscation of property by individuals or groups. We will learn that the use of natural resources is the use of private property and this use of private property is the basis of Freedom in the United States. And where there are groups and factions that are working tirelessly to challenge this given right are only imposing an oppression that is not warranted, even though their intentions are well meaning. Through the constitution, it is the responsibility of the private property owner to “police” their property as good citizens and as the natural stewards of the planet. And we will state a declaration that proposes that no matter how well intentioned given efforts are to save a species, or the planet in general, they all require handing of power/control to a third party without consent from the property owner, which is specifically prohibited in the original Constitution of the United States. With this premise, we will argue that the Constitution is not what needs to change, but the “popular” desire for these oppressive “save the environment” changes to occur and a legal system that supports the development of methods that burden the citizens with rules and taxation is where the change needs to occur. As stated before, “In God we Trust” is a concept that should be applied in these matters of private property and we, as a society, should “trust” that the self selected limitations will prove more resourceful in ”saving the planet”. We will argue that this is a less than desirable conclusion, but abandoning private property rights in the name of climate preservation, to government officials, is a much worse option.
The final articles will discuss the need for the Federal Government to provide for Military service and the intention of the military service around the world is to protect the interests of the United States and not the interests of other nations or the environment as a whole. In serving the interests of other nations or the environment, there is an additional cost to the US tax payer which requires the IRS to collect the monies in an oppressive manner from US citizens. This function of social good should be implemented through the use of non-profit agencies with the US citizen giving their own money and capital freely to these non-profit agencies. The use of Taxation will also be discussed and show that the current tax codes serve a limited set of factions, again in violation of the overall intent of the Constitution, and efforts should be made to make the tax code equitable and fair across all economic strata. Ultimately, we will end this chapter with an article that will outline the importance of the defense of the American Culture and that this defense is necessary through the promotion of such things as open standards in education that are defined locally vs. at a Federal Level and most importantly the enforcement of immigration laws that have been uniquely ignored in the past several decades.
We also will touch upon the need for the Media to perform their duties with an eye on the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence as their moral compass. Current media efforts are shown to align themselves with the factional concept of the “higher good” that inevitably reveals itself as attempts to increase government or increase big business. There is a need for the Media as a whole to abandon the desire to take sides and to do their duty as defined by the Constitution, and that is to protect the general public from oppressive laws as defined by the government and to protect the general public from businesses that might miss-use well intended laws.
The Founding Fathers defined the basics of the Constitution to ultimately protect the private property of any individual that owns private property from external appropriation of that property from another country and from the internal confiscation of property by individuals or groups. We will learn that the use of natural resources is the use of private property and this use of private property is the basis of Freedom in the United States. And where there are groups and factions that are working tirelessly to challenge this given right are only imposing an oppression that is not warranted, even though their intentions are well meaning. Through the constitution, it is the responsibility of the private property owner to “police” their property as good citizens and as the natural stewards of the planet. And we will state a declaration that proposes that no matter how well intentioned given efforts are to save a species, or the planet in general, they all require handing of power/control to a third party without consent from the property owner, which is specifically prohibited in the original Constitution of the United States. With this premise, we will argue that the Constitution is not what needs to change, but the “popular” desire for these oppressive “save the environment” changes to occur and a legal system that supports the development of methods that burden the citizens with rules and taxation is where the change needs to occur. As stated before, “In God we Trust” is a concept that should be applied in these matters of private property and we, as a society, should “trust” that the self selected limitations will prove more resourceful in ”saving the planet”. We will argue that this is a less than desirable conclusion, but abandoning private property rights in the name of climate preservation, to government officials, is a much worse option.
The final articles will discuss the need for the Federal Government to provide for Military service and the intention of the military service around the world is to protect the interests of the United States and not the interests of other nations or the environment as a whole. In serving the interests of other nations or the environment, there is an additional cost to the US tax payer which requires the IRS to collect the monies in an oppressive manner from US citizens. This function of social good should be implemented through the use of non-profit agencies with the US citizen giving their own money and capital freely to these non-profit agencies. The use of Taxation will also be discussed and show that the current tax codes serve a limited set of factions, again in violation of the overall intent of the Constitution, and efforts should be made to make the tax code equitable and fair across all economic strata. Ultimately, we will end this chapter with an article that will outline the importance of the defense of the American Culture and that this defense is necessary through the promotion of such things as open standards in education that are defined locally vs. at a Federal Level and most importantly the enforcement of immigration laws that have been uniquely ignored in the past several decades.
0 comments:
Post a Comment